create new account | forgot password


posted by dennisn on November 27th, 2011 at 11:39PM

Yes, very fitting I suppose, Rand-bitch. (Unfortunately for you, she likes dominant men, not men who obediently lap up every word she spits out.)
Link | Parent


 
 

posted by dsk on November 27th, 2011 at 11:58PM

>Unfortunately for you, she likes dominant men, not men who obediently lap up every word she spits out

Ha. Not every word, just when she has a point.

Where do you think you'd stand? She writes a book which effectively implies anarchists (i.e. you) are unintelligent, collectivist, retard scum. Then says so explicitly a multitude of times and you still suck her dick and push her movie on your blog. Haha.

posted by dennisn on November 28th, 2011 at 12:00AM

I just fucking explained her misunderstandings/mistakes. Learn to fucking read dude.

posted by dennisn on November 28th, 2011 at 12:02AM

If she arbitrarily chooses to define anarchy as having no sense of ethics, no arbitration services, no protection services, then sure .. by /that/ definition I'm not an anarchist either! Except that's a really fucking stupid definition for it. Would she say "voluntaryists" are also scum? Scumbag?

posted by dsk on November 28th, 2011 at 12:03AM

>Would she say "voluntaryists" are also scum? Scumbag?"

Who knows. Who cares. She got anarchists right though.

I see the two terms as synonym by dennisn on November 28th, 2011 at 12:06AM.

posted by dsk on November 28th, 2011 at 12:02AM

If you actually read anything she wrote, you'd have know she knew all those "objections", dismissed them and still went ahead and called you scum.

posted by dennisn on November 28th, 2011 at 12:03AM

You talk a lot of useless hot air and empty words, you waste-of-life. Having said nothing, I have nothing to respond to.

>Having said nothing, I have n by dsk on November 28th, 2011 at 12:05AM.