|
posted by dennisn on November 28th, 2011 at 12:00AM
I just fucking explained her misunderstandings/mistakes. Learn to fucking read dude.
|
posted by dennisn on November 28th, 2011 at 12:02AM
If she arbitrarily chooses to define anarchy as having no sense of ethics, no arbitration services, no protection services, then sure .. by /that/ definition I'm not an anarchist either! Except that's a really fucking stupid definition for it. Would she say "voluntaryists" are also scum? Scumbag?
|
posted by dsk on November 28th, 2011 at 12:03AM
>Would she say "voluntaryists" are also scum? Scumbag?"
Who knows. Who cares. She got anarchists right though.
|
posted by dennisn on November 28th, 2011 at 12:06AM
I see the two terms as synonymous. The only people that equate anarchy to chaos and retardedness are state propagandists, and I guess the brainwashed peons that are still infected by that propaganda. I guess she never fully cured herself from all the indoctrination she was forced to go through either.
|
|
|
|
posted by dsk on November 28th, 2011 at 12:02AM
If you actually read anything she wrote, you'd have know she knew all those "objections", dismissed them and still went ahead and called you scum.
|
posted by dennisn on November 28th, 2011 at 12:03AM
You talk a lot of useless hot air and empty words, you waste-of-life. Having said nothing, I have nothing to respond to.
|
posted by dsk on November 28th, 2011 at 12:05AM
>Having said nothing, I have nothing to respond to."
Obviously. It wasn't a debate topic. It was a reminder.
|
|
|
|