|
posted by dennisn on November 27th, 2011 at 11:39PM
Yes, very fitting I suppose, Rand-bitch. (Unfortunately for you, she likes dominant men, not men who obediently lap up every word she spits out.)
|
posted by dsk on November 27th, 2011 at 11:58PM
>Unfortunately for you, she likes dominant men, not men who obediently lap up every word she spits out
Ha. Not every word, just when she has a point.
Where do you think you'd stand? She writes a book which effectively implies anarchists (i.e. you) are unintelligent, collectivist, retard scum. Then says so explicitly a multitude of times and you still suck her dick and push her movie on your blog. Haha.
|
posted by dennisn on November 28th, 2011 at 12:00AM
I just fucking explained her misunderstandings/mistakes. Learn to fucking read dude.
|
posted by dennisn on November 28th, 2011 at 12:02AM
If she arbitrarily chooses to define anarchy as having no sense of ethics, no arbitration services, no protection services, then sure .. by /that/ definition I'm not an anarchist either! Except that's a really fucking stupid definition for it. Would she say "voluntaryists" are also scum? Scumbag?
|
|
posted by dsk on November 28th, 2011 at 12:02AM
If you actually read anything she wrote, you'd have know she knew all those "objections", dismissed them and still went ahead and called you scum.
|
|
|
|
