posted by dennisn on November 23rd, 2011 at 9:19PM

You are just repeating yourself. All you said here is that it offers a "cross-platform" framework. We've been through all this before, I swear. Not only does cross-platform shit already exist (GTK/Qt for the UI, and countless libraries, etc), not only has cross-platform shit been the holy grail since computers were invented (it's not that it's technically hard to achieve -- it's that morons like you buy retarded piece-of-shit software that *deliberately* fucks you in the ass with *deliberately* non-standard proprietary crap. But, instead of addressing the real fucking problem, you shit a whole new layer of crap out of your ass to try to bandage things together. (Gentoo has no problem talking to the BSDs or Ubuntu.)), but I don't even care if you actually prefer this crap -- just don't stuff it down other people's throats, who actually have a decent operating system that respects standards. Just because your OS is an evil piece of shit, doesn't mean you can invent an entirely new abstraction layer in the first program in your start menu (they could have added this abstraction layer anywhere, but since it's geared towards morons, that's where it went), and then start jumping up like a lunatic trying to get everyone else (who already has everything you're offering) to install it too, and pretending like it's now some integral part of websites -- web 2.0!!1! (Except, as I mentioned, probably everything you're drooling and fantasizing about already exists.)

But, even if I go out on a very long and weak limb and buy your bullshit that any of the crap you're talking about is useful, you still haven't addressed any of the fundamental criticisms I raised about JS! Seems to me like you aren't here to debate -- you just want someone to validate your closed-mind.

Link | Parent