posted by dsk on March 18th, 2008 at 2:28PM
>The point is, though, that the difference exists (whether it's "sufficient" or not is immaterial in this context).
By your argument, I could claim that chickens in fact, do not exist. What we now know as chickens are actually unnamed flightless descendants of chickens of yesteryear. >I think the whole "issue" between the chicken v. egg is the "issue" between evolution and creation theory. Close. The question itself is framed for creationism. It is a caricature of evolution. There is no clear boundary in a lineage that you can point to and say "Ah ha - this is where chickens began".
|