posted by sleepy-sniper on July 10th, 2023 at 11:49PM
> I remember asking him specifically about Liberland and he said that it ought not exist.
For fuck's sake, I'd let it exist if it would get you to stop autistically screeching about it. Liberland is never going to be anything other than a shitty island that nobody cares about.
Shitty land for shitty people. Chernobyl isn't a bad place for Ancaps either, at least for those who will never change their minds.
> only recently you casually confusingly say that you'd support it in other countries.
There's nothing confusing about this. Geopolitics is a thing. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
> I really think Blithering would at least get his nasty fingers ready on the launch trigger, and seriously consider doing it, and justify it in his retard-head as a just preemptive action.
He wouldn't do that. I know him better than you do. He cares about the environment, and anybody who needlessly nukes someone else is going to be paying a very hefty pollution tax.
For fuck's sake, I'd let it exist if it would get you to stop autistically screeching about it. Liberland is never going to be anything other than a shitty island that nobody cares about.
Shitty land for shitty people. Chernobyl isn't a bad place for Ancaps either, at least for those who will never change their minds.
> only recently you casually confusingly say that you'd support it in other countries.
There's nothing confusing about this. Geopolitics is a thing. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
> I really think Blithering would at least get his nasty fingers ready on the launch trigger, and seriously consider doing it, and justify it in his retard-head as a just preemptive action.
He wouldn't do that. I know him better than you do. He cares about the environment, and anybody who needlessly nukes someone else is going to be paying a very hefty pollution tax.
|
posted by dennisn on July 10th, 2023 at 11:55PM
> For fuck's sake, I'd let it exist if it would get you to stop autistically screeching about it. Liberland is never going to be anything other than a shitty island that nobody cares about.
Again, you confused pussy, your gay friend disagrees with you about this! Why didn't you tell him he's wrong and psycho and evil? (HE WAS SERIOUS - HE PROVIDED CRINGE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR IT TOO.) And what about uninhabited, unpossessed, effectively unowned northern north america? I mean, it's not even your mother fucking country. > Shitty land for shitty people. Chernobyl isn't a bad place for Ancaps either, at least for those who will never change their minds. You're too stupid, to realize how this undermines your faggot position, fag. It reveals that you don't in fact care about consent, about freedom. I'd happily give dirty commies their own GOOD clean land, and genuinely wish them luck. Cuz I'm not a psycho insecure bitch like you and your faggot e-friend. > There's nothing confusing about this. Geopolitics is a thing. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. I already explained the confusion. You think that something that benefited the US would hurt your enemies. > anybody who needlessly nukes someone else Obviously that piece of shit will RATIONALIZE it, like you do, the way you rationalize brutal theft and enslavement. For example, he'll say that we'll inevitablye somehow launch nukes first or sabotage his country if he doesn't act first. The US were really really close to doing that with Russia just a few years ago.
|
