|
posted by dennisn on September 8th, 2015 at 6:53PM
I find myself often wondering this, how many people actually have "real friends". Specifically, why it's not far more common. I mean, we all want them, don't we?
(If you don't know whether they're real or fake, they're probably fake :D.)
As for government-education, I dunno, if you really want it, go for it :p. But, for certain topics (like history, art, ethics, law, philosophy) you should keep in mind that it will be *heavily* heavily propagandized and biased and in many cases non-sensical :s.
|
Well, I label real friends as the people who have been there since the start, in this case, only 2 for me. But that isn't the case, anyways.
Oh I am taking history and law enforcement (because of my dad, I was basically forced to) and I am actually enjoying both of them. And yes, I created my email when I used to listen to them a bunch, still do, but not really anymore. And the ashlee, she is my puppy, ha.
|
posted by dennisn on September 8th, 2015 at 7:03PM
I think friendship should be more than that... for example, a good honest connection. I can think of some examples when it might be better for people to split... eg. if someone has a bad habit, and refuses to listen to her friend, then still sticking with that friend could be an indirect way of "enabling" / encouraging that bad habit.
Oh boy, we have a lot to talk about then, regarding history and law enforcement. Let me throw you a teaser:
Probably every single country was founded unethically, through violence and theft from innocent people. What gives them the right or authority to make laws? For example, would you respect the laws that a murderer forces on you?
I used to listen to Escape the Fate too... I like that mellow emo pop-punk :p. Brings out my inner-romantic.
|
If you put it that way I get a much more broad view of what you are saying, and I agree with you. See, with Paola, I am not so forward with her flaws, I just point them out little by little when she is doing them.
Excellent question, makes me think at 1 in the morning. Well, I would respect them yet I wouldn't. Every country had some mass murder and genocide involved, for example, Germany had its holocaust before they had the chance to pass laws against religion racism. If any of the presidents before were alive, I think there apologies weren't sincere. I think somewhat deep inside them they didn't really mean the apology of the war. I am sure they wanted that war. Honestly, I wouldn't. My answer is no, I wouldn't respect the laws of someone who has followed by them for decades. What is the point? They say freedom of speech or freedom in general, yet they prohibid us as humans to do many things. I haven't thought of it as much but it makes me angry, it's like being trapped inside a world were everyone wants to boss you around to make you do somethings and stop you from doing others. The negative side of this is that if someone tries to rebel against them, they are seen as the bad guy, and no one really looks at why they are doing it.
I am more of an indie person, you should listen to Oh!Hello and the Story So Far. (:
|
|
|
|
