posted by dennisn on December 9th, 2011 at 6:21PM
Oh, just to add to your personal preference for kidnapping and caging anti-copyright people, what do you think will happen when a competing dispute resolution organization pops up, and offers all the exact same services, but instead of expensive kidnapping and incarceration, they offer some cheaper retaliatory alternative -- that's peaceful to boot. Which organization do you suppose will prosper? Would you continue paying $100/month for your hardlined org, possibly in the hopes of long-term indirect impossible-to-measure benefits of more serious copyright-enforcement ... or $50/month for a cheaper alternative -- that still respects copyright -- but doesn't choose to enforce it so expensively/brutally? Which would you subscribe to?
But, I guess the more important question isn't this kind of speculation -- it's the process. What exactly are you afraid of, if competing dispute resolutions arise? You haven't really given any examples -- but you claim they exist.
But, I guess the more important question isn't this kind of speculation -- it's the process. What exactly are you afraid of, if competing dispute resolutions arise? You haven't really given any examples -- but you claim they exist.
