posted by dsk on November 23rd, 2011 at 8:34PM
>Webpages were designed for blogs and information
Very early versions of the web were designed to handle only simple marked up text. THAT WAS THE STARTING POINT, NOT THE END POINT.
>Nobody ever brought the value of webpages into dispute.
You did. You still do. Because you are a retard, who doesn't know he's a retard. *THIS* isn't a webpage as originally envisioned. It doesn't just serve lightly marked up text. It's a content management system that handles user input (files and text), centrally manages and stores it and returns it specifically formatted to users (formatting that is context sensitive, allowing it, for example to correctly display links to images as images and polls). You've already went beyond the confines of what "Webpages" were originally envisioned it to be.
Very early versions of the web were designed to handle only simple marked up text. THAT WAS THE STARTING POINT, NOT THE END POINT.
>Nobody ever brought the value of webpages into dispute.
You did. You still do. Because you are a retard, who doesn't know he's a retard. *THIS* isn't a webpage as originally envisioned. It doesn't just serve lightly marked up text. It's a content management system that handles user input (files and text), centrally manages and stores it and returns it specifically formatted to users (formatting that is context sensitive, allowing it, for example to correctly display links to images as images and polls). You've already went beyond the confines of what "Webpages" were originally envisioned it to be.
|
posted by dennisn on November 23rd, 2011 at 9:26PM
Fair enough. I am all for evolving websites, and browsers too. Having centrally-controlled, non-customizable, 100%cpu consuming, crippled apps in my webpages is not evolution, IMHO.
|
