posted by dennisn on January 28th, 2011 at 12:02PM
No, in fact it is not at all irrational *for me to exist*. There are rapists *everywhere* -- you, for example, are one. The primary, and only important point, is that of the *rapist*.
And there was no assumption that the rapist wasn't raping :P. Lol. The whole point of having the god-damned rapist in the thought experiment, was because of his raping! Otherwise, he's just a normal inoffensive dude!
The rapists in Quebec are just as violent and vulgar as those in Ontario. I don't see your point in "preferring anal rape over vaginal rape".
Honestly nylorac, why can't you just say rape is wrong. Period. Why all this shady confused secondary argumentation?
More pertinently, do *you* support rape?
And there was no assumption that the rapist wasn't raping :P. Lol. The whole point of having the god-damned rapist in the thought experiment, was because of his raping! Otherwise, he's just a normal inoffensive dude!
The rapists in Quebec are just as violent and vulgar as those in Ontario. I don't see your point in "preferring anal rape over vaginal rape".
Honestly nylorac, why can't you just say rape is wrong. Period. Why all this shady confused secondary argumentation?
More pertinently, do *you* support rape?
