posted by dennisn on September 7th, 2010 at 2:19PM
Je sais, and I did.
The article was supposed to be an informative one about the benefits of cinnamon. Not only was that claim *wrong* (scientifically wrong too, not hand-wavingly wrong), but was purely based on hearsay. If I wanted hearsay, I would have asked a palm-reader.
In fact, the author of the article knew full well that the claim was false, as pretty much all aphrodisiac-claimists know -- he lied to us, for a little titillation. (And not even good titillation -- but that stupid kind that dumbass tourguides give to tourists on vacation.)
