posted by jaysonn on November 4th, 2009 at 12:33PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/w...B_vaccine#Safety
> A 2007 study found that the vaccination does not seem to increase the risk of a first episode of MS in childhood.
Why is this website anti-science?
> A 2007 study found that the vaccination does not seem to increase the risk of a first episode of MS in childhood.
Why is this website anti-science?
|
posted by dennisn on November 4th, 2009 at 12:48PM
I'm also skeptical of that link between hepB and MS. It does smell a little fishy from the anti-vaccination groupies. I'm surprised that wikipedia/science hasn't resolved the issue yet. Then again, the number of alleged and disputed cancer-causing links out there is pretty staggering.
But why do you say it's anti-science? If you know of a study that supports or derides the link, you should edit the article. |
