create new account | forgot password


posted by rick on October 2nd, 2008 at 2:21AM

I already said that I disagree with it on a philosophical level. It's absurd that the bailout will, at least initially, benefit the financial institutions that created this mess, rather than going to the individuals who will suffer the consequences the most.

But I think the spiralling effect of the collapse of those financial institutions is a greater evil that needs to be addressed.
Link | Parent


 
 

posted by dennisn on October 2nd, 2008 at 9:38AM

No--it is most definitely NOT a greater evil to leave the market (*the people!*) alone. It has absolutely nothing to do with me. I have absolutely no obligation to "fix" it. Nobody has any right to force me to fix it. I don't know why you preface ideas of right and wrong with the term "philosophical". If it's wrong, DON'T DO IT!

Your eagerness to violate real-life individuals' freedoms, to *help* the perpetrators of this mess, for some *ethereal* notion of "the economy", is absurd. And most definitely *wrong*.

posted by rick on October 2nd, 2008 at 10:00AM

First of all, market != people. Market is the relationship between supply and demand. I don't even know where your notion came from.

Also, you can keep believing in your black and white world while businesses shut down and everyone loses their jobs. You go tell the unemployed man who has to support his family that fixing the economy is wrong, and that the economy doesn't affect him. Because when the economy collapses, everyone is affected.

posted by dennisn on October 2nd, 2008 at 10:11AM

Well, the conventional pedestrian idea of "the market" is simply the mutual transactions among people. That's all. It is usually referred to in opposition to government-forced transactions (ie. nationalized institutions). Ie. governments mandating the national supply and demand isn't, at least in this conventional definition, a valid market phenomenon.

Also, I actually strongly feel that this bailout will destroy the US economy further. It takes away more and more freedom from individuals. It makes government bigger.

BUT. Most importantly. You conveniently ignore my loudest complaints--that I had absolutely nothing to do with this mess, and that NOBODY has the right to force me to "fix" it. (Fix is in quotations for the aforementioned reason.)

It is basically just this last point that I should brought up--everything else is just personal opinion.

posted by rick on October 2nd, 2008 at 5:36PM

I think the bailout takes away more freedoms from financial institutions than individuals. It does make government bigger, in the form of regulations for these institutions. I think it's worth the effort to investigate and discuss what the bailout actually is, because there are misconceptions about it and it hasn't been sold very well by politicians. (Admittedly, I don't know enough about it to start this conversation, so I'll need to do some investigation myself.)

Yes, you did nothing to cause this mess, but you will definitely feel the effects of it. Something needs to be done, and no one wants to pay for it. This was evident in the vote in the House; everyone secretly wanted the bill to pass, but no one wanted to commit to it themselves.

But this is where one of the misconceptions come in. From what I understand, the bailout is more of a loan than a hand-out. Someone coined the term "bailout" at the beginning of the process and it kind of stuck. Again, I don't know enough about it to discuss in detail at the moment.

by rick on October 3rd, 2008 at 5:12PM.
You know Ricky, you're a reall by dennisn on October 2nd, 2008 at 6:20PM.
Right. So it was wrong for the by rick on October 3rd, 2008 at 5:13PM.
>And it was wrong for consumer by dsk on October 7th, 2008 at 8:30AM.
Some random researching led me by rick on October 9th, 2008 at 5:09AM.
No argument here. That's consi by rick on October 7th, 2008 at 8:09PM.
>The investment banks successf by dsk on October 8th, 2008 at 12:26AM.
The problem is two-fold: The b by rick on October 9th, 2008 at 4:32AM.
Ricky, are you a part of the g by dennisn on October 9th, 2008 at 10:08AM.
I don't think anyone is in the by rick on October 9th, 2008 at 4:51PM.
Well, you seemed to be suggest by dennisn on October 9th, 2008 at 5:30PM.
>If we didn't have the balls t by story on October 9th, 2008 at 6:35PM.
If you can somehow say, with a by dennisn on October 10th, 2008 at 11:54AM.
>thus digging themselves into by dsk on October 9th, 2008 at 9:39AM.
No. The the banks did not beha by dennisn on October 7th, 2008 at 10:24PM.
>Housing prices were rising, w by dsk on October 9th, 2008 at 9:56AM.
Yes and no. The banks knew th by rick on October 9th, 2008 at 5:02AM.
As I said before, there are tw by dennisn on October 3rd, 2008 at 7:21PM.