create new account | forgot password

BPA Not So Bad
posted by dennisn on February 14th, 2015 at 1:28PM

10 male volunteers ate warmed tomato soup in which researchers had placed a traceable form of BPA. They took multiple blood and urine samples over a 24 hour period.

The team found that coating the mouth in this way did not lead to higher levels of the active form of BPA in blood. As in all human studies to date, the body inactivated 998 out of every 1000 BPA molecules by the time BPA entered the bloodstream.

"Just as important, we confirmed that there is no merit to hypotheses that BPA accumulates in humans. The entire dose of BPA was eliminated in urine within 24 hours, with no evidence of accumulation," said Teeguarden.
Link


 
 

posted by dennisn on April 26th, 2015 at 8:50PM

During high dietary exposures, BPA concentrations in serum were undetectable in 83% of the 320 samples collected and less than the limit of detection in all samples.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.g.../pubmed/21705716

posted by jenni on February 15th, 2015 at 2:55PM

But what kind of damage could it do to the body within the 24 hours it does travel through le corps?

posted by dennisn on February 15th, 2015 at 8:16PM

Good question. And if people use BPA-infused foods daily (like baby bottles, or canned foods), they'll have bits of BPA in them 24/7. There's also the point that although adults are good at detoxifying BPA, infants aren't. I also worry about studies that have such a low number of participants, especially for such a contentious issue. Sigh.

posted by jenni on February 16th, 2015 at 8:59PM

What kind of person do you think would want to participate in a study for something that may or may not kill you, we just aren't sure yet :S I wonder how they even acquire any participants at all.

posted by dennisn on February 17th, 2015 at 5:25AM

Lots of people believe that BPA is harmless. They'd participate.