posted by dennisn on August 25th, 2012 at 12:45AM
I also found the essay tediously poetic. Fortunately, it was well worth the effort to decipher.
I don't think people are necessarily unprincipled to simultaneously applaud the conscientious defecting soldier, and the government. One of the clever tricks of government is to diffuse responsibility for anything. Nobody is held accountable for anything. So, it is never the State's fault as a whole -- never the system's fault -- but rather the ruling party. For example, it is not uncommon for people today to applaud such soldiers AND support the other parties in government. I mean, technically they are being unprincipled, of course -- but a better way to describe such people is naive/ignorant. Because they do kinda subscribe to the principles of non-violence and moral fortitude. They just haven't thought things through enough. They haven't learned enough. He never suggests that principles should only benefit the individual. Heck, he was persecuted for his principles, for the sake of others -- for the slaves. The way governments think of their slaves, whether it is ostensibly dehumanizing or ennobling, is irrelevant. The only question worth discussing is whether it violently imposes it's will on unwilling people or not. What you need to do to become a conscientious individual, is to understand that fully :). You will probably hardly ever make others feel the same way though, via essays or otherwise. Only incredibly large dedicated doses of time energy and love may offer that possibility. |