posted by dennisn on August 9th, 2012 at 9:06PM
"[The lack of curiosity (and by extension barbarism)] happens in urban areas just as frequently [as in rural areas]".
I'm not so sure about that, since simply by virtue of being surrounded by more people, more diversity, one is almost certainly going to have a broader view of things. It makes sense to me that rural areas would be more "backwards" / barbaric, since they are more isolated, incestuous, self-reinforcing. Of course, we could search for studies, to see the prevalence of "barbaric" events in rural versus urban environments, to avoid handwaving ourselves :D. This study [1] seems to suggest rural areas are indeed more barbaric :p. Nevertheless, he didn't mean that only the rural areas need to be debarbarized -- just that they are more at risk. It is fascinating (if it's true), that most of the Nazi torturers were from rural areas. It certainly jives with my intuitive experiences with urban and rural peoples. I like your critique of "Public Education" :). That sentence that you quoted from him about love was actually criticizing the imperative nature of culture/Statism -- he was saying that love can't really exist in "mediated relationships" -- that it has to be spontaneous / "immediate" -- so I think you two are in agreement on that point. Although I guess he does imply that the barbaric / broken / traumatized people aren't capable of love. Do you think the Nazis in Auschwitz were capable of love? [1] http://www.justice.gc.ca/.../rd4-rr4/p2.html
|