create new account | forgot password

Things that couldn't be done with Javascript
posted by dsk on October 13th, 2011 at 7:20PM

google maps. You use'em.
Link


 
 

posted by dennisn on October 13th, 2011 at 7:23PM

I know. It's the only useful thing I've seen from it -- 99.9% crap and malware ... 0.1% useful maps.

Incidentally, that mapping function can/should be done by a real application -- like Google Earth(?) (which is closed-source or something :.)

posted by moi on October 16th, 2011 at 9:01AM

that 0.1% is worth 40% (imho)

posted by dennisn on October 16th, 2011 at 9:09AM

The thing is, Google Maps doesn't really have anything to do with JavaShit -- it's Google's massive wallet and map database. They simply chose to make it available with JavaShit to control their customers more -- you are forced to download their complete JS-Google-Map application each time, which they have full control over -- ie. if they choose to insert ads or whatever. I would really prefer it if I didn't have to download the map-application every time I wanted to access it. I would really prefer if there were alternative interfaces for it. Etc.

posted by dsk on October 16th, 2011 at 10:00PM

>Google Maps doesn't really have anything to do with JavaShit

Yes and No. Without JS, Google maps is what map quest used to be. With JS, it's magic.

>I would really prefer it if I didn't have to download the map-application every time I wanted to access it.

Every web-app can be re-implemented as a native install app. Even your blog. That's not what makes them special.

Disagree. I remember a time be by dennisn on October 17th, 2011 at 7:40PM.

posted by dennisn on October 16th, 2011 at 9:11AM

(So, there is a (closed-source?) version of it -- Google Earth(?), that is a baby step in the right direction -- and, I think, in addition to the normal maps and stuff, you can do better 3D fly-bys, etc? Real applications are so much better, and saner.)