create new account | forgot password

No
posted by Vina on June 25th, 2008 at 5:50PM

We, the norm, consume meat because it is a dietary requirement to keep us balanced.   We need protein and VitB12.   Though, "most" people don't care about what nutrients meat provides, but they can feel the lack of energy w/out it.   Some alternatives are just not enough to compensate.   No one talks about slaughterhouses when they eat meat.   It's about dietary intake.
Link | Parent


 
 

posted by dennisn on June 30th, 2008 at 10:44AM

Pasofol Says: http://www.youngwomenshealth.org/b12.html
B12 wheats and whole grains seem to contain high %.

posted by Nylorac on June 25th, 2008 at 11:26PM

>>No one talks about slaughterhouses when they eat meat. It's about dietary intake.

Christian church-goers don't speak of the brutality within its history, but they still like to enjoy the mass and only speak of the times referred to in the Bible.  

Little children go to and enjoy attending public school and make friends, but are unaware of how Jean-Jacques Rousseau's /Emile/ both influenced (1) today's educational system's model, and (2) how the same piece of work was misogynistic and can be argued to have found no fault with murder (in special cases, but still, his Social Contract almost explicitly encouraged mob mentality, if not explicitly... but that's for another day).

The outcome (i.e. good dietary intake, or happy church-goer life, or educated child) doesn't excuse the ignorance (i.e. the slaughterhouses, or stupid fuckers).   Should the outcome be positive in spite of ignorance, this is only happenstance.   It is unfortunate.   "Happenstance" is "following the crowd", "going with the grain"... basically doing whatever everyone else is doing simply because everyone else is doing it.   It's zombie-ish.

posted by Driusan on June 26th, 2008 at 8:58AM

Way to define a word in a word that's completely orthogonal to all other usages of said word http://www.google.com/search?q=meatist currently in existence , Carolyn. Can always count on your attempts to define things to prove that definitions are meaningless.

posted by dennisn on June 26th, 2008 at 12:11PM

How do you figure it was orthogonal? According to urbandictionary, it was mainly someone who chooses to eat meat. (It was also, more humorously, defined like racism, concerning the descrimination of different kinds of meat.) She simply added a further constraint -- the cognizance of the food source, which is understandable.

Rapist -- someone who rapes.
Elitist -- someone who believes in the rule of elites
Meatist -- someone who eats meat/believes in cause of meat-eating.

It may not have been perfectly parallel, but certainly not orthogonal. I'd say 10% askance.

posted by Nylorac on June 26th, 2008 at 12:19PM

I'd say that my definition described a subset of the actual definition's.   How 'bout we call my meatist "prime meatist" for the hell of it, and call its complement the the "meat-eating non-prime-meatist" purely for the sake of sounding retardedly wordy for no apparent good reason?

Nah -- I think it's reasonable by dennisn on June 26th, 2008 at 2:48PM.
So, you're saying that the def by Nylorac on June 26th, 2008 at 2:52PM.
I think it's the same definiti by dennisn on June 26th, 2008 at 4:42PM.

posted by Nylorac on June 26th, 2008 at 10:28AM

Crap.   I'm going to remove the word.

posted by dennisn on June 26th, 2008 at 10:51AM

Is it just me, or has Google been offline/inaccessible a lot lately. Ie. now.

you by pasofol on June 26th, 2008 at 11:16AM.
You're right. I could access i by dennisn on June 26th, 2008 at 11:58AM.

posted by Driusan on June 25th, 2008 at 10:45PM

I have never once seen a militant meatist who thinks about their dietary content or requirements for any reason other than an excuse for why they "need" to have meat, or because they want to make fun of vegetarians, or because a doctor warned them about health problems caused by too much cholesterol/salt/saturated fat/whatever.

Green leaves coupled with nuts/legumes have roughly the same protein as meat. If you find your diet is exhausting you, you should probably check your vitamin intake before your protein.

posted by dennisn on June 25th, 2008 at 6:13PM

"Some alternatives" indeed may not be enough to compensate. *Many others* do compensate just fine :). Obviously I do not suggest anyone use those defficient alternatives -- but rather the sufficient ones. Vegans are no different than anyone else in their need and consumption of protein and B12 -- they just do it more ethically.

But, the fact that "no one talks about [the] slaughterhouses when they eat meat" completely ignores the facts of their unethicalnesses -- ranging from devastating environmental damage (massive fecal waste ponds, methane emissions, water consumption) to animal cruelty (a pig chained to a cage, unable to walk during it's entire life, malnurished, with atrophied legs). Meat does not scale well with growing global population. (Not to mention the cruelty of it.) Who, if not you the consumer, is responsible for these problems?

posted by Nylorac on June 25th, 2008 at 11:02PM

Vina, we all read the following article:

http://www.rollingstone.c...orst_polluters/1 pork's dirty secret.

Trust me.   Read it.

posted by Nylorac on June 26th, 2008 at 10:30AM

I don't recall making my link look nice.   Dennis....